One key difference between protesting and tribunal court actions in the context of resolving human rights complaints in Australia is the nature of their approach and outcomes:
-
Protesting is a public demonstration aimed at raising awareness, expressing dissent, or advocating for change about a particular issue, including human rights violations. Protests often involve collective action by individuals or groups and can serve to influence public opinion, government policy, or societal attitudes. However, protests do not have a formal legal outcome or enforceable resolution.
-
Tribunal court actions, on the other hand, involve legal processes where individuals file complaints with a tribunal or court that has the authority to adjudicate disputes related to human rights violations. These actions are formal and structured, following legal procedures, and can result in binding decisions, remedies, or compensation for the complainant. Tribunal actions provide a legal avenue for individuals to seek justice and accountability for violations of their rights.
In summary, the main difference lies in the nature of the proceedings: protesting is an informal, collective action for advocacy, while tribunal actions are formal legal processes aimed at providing a resolution with enforceable outcomes.