Lenny made a mistake in his proof. The correct response is:
The definition of a perpendicular bisector tells you that IL¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JL¯¯¯¯¯¯¯, not that IM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅JM¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯.
Explanation:
In a proof regarding the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem, it is essential to understand the definition of a perpendicular bisector. The definition states that a perpendicular bisector divides a segment into two equal parts at a right angle. Thus, if HK is the perpendicular bisector of IJ, this means \( IL \cong JL \), where L is the midpoint of IJ. Lenny mistakenly stated that the segments \( IM \) and \( JM \) are congruent, which is not the correct application of the definition. The segments that should be referenced for congruence in this context are those created by the perpendicular bisector and their distances to the midpoint L.