FMNR starts by simply leaving the land alone to recover by itself. Even in dry, degraded fields, the soil often contains tree stumps and roots. Farmers usually try to dig these out and destroy them before planting crops. However, in FMNR, the farmers simply allow a few of these roots to grow into trees. When they are large enough, the farmers begin pruning them in ways that promote healthy growth. Thereafter, the trees provide a steady supply of firewood, shade, stability, and nutrients for other crops.
In contrast to tree-planting, FMNR requires no money and relatively little effort. The trees have a high survival rate since they are native species and are already established in the soil. Farmers who have adopted FMNR have consistently seen significant improvements in their crops and in their quality of life. These improvements begin within the first year of letting the trees grow.
Which detail from "Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration" might raise questions about the Green Belt Movement's claims of success?
A.
the significant improvements in crops using FMNR
B.
the need to burn tree branches for fuel
C.
the low survival rates of newly planted trees
D.
the failure of trees to prevent erosion
1 answer
The detail from "Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration" that might raise questions about the Green Belt Movement's claims of success is:
C. the low survival rates of newly planted trees
This detail contrasts with the high survival rates of trees in FMNR and could call into question the effectiveness of tree-planting initiatives like those promoted by the Green Belt Movement, especially if a significant percentage of newly planted trees typically fail to thrive.
