The second paragraph refines the definition presented in the first paragraph by providing specific examples that illustrate the distinction between a simple falsehood and a conspiracy theory. While the first paragraph defines a conspiracy theory as involving a group conducting secret deeds that harm others, the second paragraph clarifies this definition by examining two false beliefs: the belief that vaccines cause autism and the belief that fluoride is harmful. It demonstrates that while these beliefs can exist as falsehoods on their own, they become conspiracy theories when they include an element of covert actions by groups (such as health officials or government officials) that are supposedly manipulating or controlling the public. This elaboration emphasizes the necessity of a conspiratorial element—secretive, harmful actions by groups—in defining a conspiracy theory, thereby refining the initial definition.
People — even smart and savvy ones — mix up conspiracy theories, falsehoods and myths. Here is the key difference: A conspiracy — and by extension a conspiracy theory — must involve a group of people conducting secret deeds that disadvantage or infringe on the rights of others. For instance, linking vaccines to autism is a false belief. If you think vaccines cause autism because health officials deem it so, then you believe in a conspiracy theory. Another falsehood is that fluoride is harmful to your body. A conspiracy theory is that fluoride is harmful to your body and a form of mind control perpetuated by government officials.Use the passage to answer the question. In this passage how does the second paragraph refine the definition presented in the first paragraph?
1 answer