Part 1: Drawbacks and Dangers of Nuclear Power

Three Mile Island
Watch the following New York Times Documentary video:
Three Mile Island Documentary: Nuclear Power's Promise and Peril | Retro Report | The New York Times
While watching the video, please answer the following questions:
1. What was Three Mile Island? Where was it located, and why is it important?

2. What occurred during the accident in 1979? Describe in detail the events that led to the eventual radiation leak. Please use scientific terminology to describe the event.

3. Could the accident have been prevented? Why/why not?

4. How did this accident contribute to the public’s general perception of Nuclear Power?

5. How are “millennial environmentalists” changing views on the use of nuclear power?
Chernobyl
6. What was Chernobyl? Where was it located, and why is it important?

7. What led to most of the deaths that resulted from the nuclear reactor explosion in Chernobyl?

8. What made the nuclear disaster so dangerous?

Fukushima
9. What was Fukushima? Where was it located, and why is it important?

10. Could the accident have been prevented? Why/why not?

11. List some of the lingering effects of the Fukushima disaster. How has this event impacted the people who live in the area?

1 answer

Part 1: Drawbacks and Dangers of Nuclear Power

Three Mile Island

  1. What was Three Mile Island? Where was it located, and why is it important?

    • Three Mile Island (TMI) is a nuclear power plant located in Pennsylvania, USA. It is significant because it was the site of a major accident on March 28, 1979, which resulted in the most serious accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant history. The incident raised concerns about the safety of nuclear energy and led to changes in regulatory policies and public attitudes toward nuclear power.
  2. What occurred during the accident in 1979? Describe in detail the events that led to the eventual radiation leak.

    • During the accident at Three Mile Island, a combination of mechanical failures, design-related problems, and human error led to a partial meltdown of the reactor core. It began with a malfunction in the secondary system—a non-nuclear part of the plant—which caused the coolant to become insufficient. Operators misdiagnosed the problem due to confusing indicators on the control panel, failing to recognize that the reactor was struggling to cool down. As the nuclear fuel overheated, the reactor experienced a partial meltdown, and the reactor containment building allowed a small amount of radioactive gases to escape into the environment.
  3. Could the accident have been prevented? Why/why not?

    • Many experts believe the accident at Three Mile Island could have been prevented. Issues including inadequate operator training, flawed reactor design, and poor communication contributed to the crisis. If the operators had been better trained to understand the reactor's systems and could accurately interpret the signals indicating a loss of cooling, they could have taken corrective measures sooner.
  4. How did this accident contribute to the public’s general perception of Nuclear Power?

    • The Three Mile Island accident significantly shaped public perception of nuclear power, instilling fear and skepticism. Following the incident, many people questioned the safety of nuclear energy, leading to a drop in new nuclear plant construction in the U.S. and increased regulatory scrutiny of existing facilities.
  5. How are “millennial environmentalists” changing views on the use of nuclear power?

    • Millennial environmentalists are advocating for a more nuanced view of energy sources, recognizing nuclear power as a potential climate change mitigation tool due to its low greenhouse gas emissions. They emphasize the need for clean energy transformation and often argue that nuclear can be part of an energy portfolio alongside renewables. This shift reflects growing concerns about the impacts of climate change and the urgent need for reliable energy sources that can complement renewables.

Chernobyl

  1. What was Chernobyl? Where was it located, and why is it important?

    • Chernobyl was a nuclear power plant located near the town of Pripyat in Ukraine (then part of the Soviet Union). It is important because of the catastrophic nuclear disaster that occurred on April 26, 1986, when a reactor exploded, leading to the release of a massive amount of radioactive material into the environment. It is one of the worst nuclear disasters in history and has had long-lasting health, environmental, and socio-economic impacts.
  2. What led to most of the deaths that resulted from the nuclear reactor explosion in Chernobyl?

    • Most of the deaths resulting from the Chernobyl disaster were attributed to acute radiation sickness (ARS), which developed in first responders and plant workers exposed to high levels of radiation. Long-term health effects, including thyroid cancer and other radiation-induced illnesses, have also resulted in significant mortality and morbidity among the affected populations in subsequent years.
  3. What made the nuclear disaster so dangerous?

    • The Chernobyl disaster was exacerbated by the design flaws of the RBMK reactor, which lacked a robust containment structure and had a positive void coefficient that caused uncontrollable power surges. The management decisions leading up to the test that caused the explosion involved improper safety protocols and failure to heed warnings about possible risks. The widespread release of radioactive materials affected a large geographical area, contaminating the environment and impacting public health.

Fukushima

  1. What was Fukushima? Where was it located, and why is it important?

    • Fukushima refers to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station, located in Ōkuma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. It is significant because it was the site of a nuclear disaster on March 11, 2011, triggered by a massive earthquake and tsunami that disabled the power supply and cooling systems of three reactors, leading to core meltdowns and the release of radioactive materials.
  2. Could the accident have been prevented? Why/why not?

    • The Fukushima disaster could arguably have been mitigated. Before the disaster, concerns had been raised about the plant's vulnerability to tsunamis and earthquake risks. Improvements in safety protocols and infrastructure could have been implemented, including reinforcement against seismic events and better emergency preparedness plans.
  3. List some of the lingering effects of the Fukushima disaster. How has this event impacted the people who live in the area?

    • Lingering effects of the Fukushima disaster include severe contamination of land and water, long-term health impacts on the local population, and displacement of residents from the exclusion zone. Many residents continue to experience psychological distress due to anxiety about radiation exposure and uncertainty about their future. The disaster also led to significant economic impacts, including the loss of jobs in agriculture and fishing, and has influenced energy policy and public opinion on nuclear power both in Japan and globally.
Similar Questions
  1. Part 1: Drawbacks and Dangers of Nuclear PowerThree Mile Island Watch the following New York Times Documentary video: Three Mile
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Rethinking and Reinventing Nuclear PowerWatch the following video: The fight to rethink (and reinvent) nuclear power 1. What
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions