paraphrase:

Question

The Draft Framework is divided into five parts.
Part 1 addresses the challenges associated with
human genome editing, bearing in mind its scientific
potential and giving a concise overview of ethical
concerns. Part 2 speaks to the need to establish
global baseline standards while acknowledging that
different regulatory approaches may be required
taking into account that the harm–benefit analysis
varies across jurisdictions. Part 3 proposes values
and principles such as human dignity, which ought
to be taken into consideration in regulating human
genome editing. Part 4 acknowledges existing infrastructure, including institutions and civil society,
which would need to be leveraged to facilitate the
establishment of global standards. Part 5 recognises
that human genome editing may be applied in a
wide range of settings, including heritable genome
editing, and thus sets out different scenarios—with
the aim of illustrating how the principles outlined
under part 3 conjoin.

Answer 1

The Draft Framework consists of five parts. The first part discusses the challenges of human genome editing and highlights ethical concerns. Part 2 emphasizes the importance of setting global standards while recognizing that different regulatory approaches may be necessary based on varying harm-benefit analyses in different jurisdictions. Part 3 introduces values and principles such as human dignity that should guide the regulation of human genome editing. Part 4 acknowledges the existing infrastructure, institutions, and civil society that can help establish global standards. Part 5 recognizes the potential applications of human genome editing in various settings, including heritable genome editing, and provides scenarios to demonstrate how the principles outlined in Part 3 can be applied.