To perform a dilation of a shape with respect to the origin, you multiply the coordinates of each vertex by the scale factor. Here, the scale factor (magnitude of dilation) is 3.
If the original coordinates of the vertices of the parallelogram are:
- \( E(x_1, y_1) \)
- \( F(x_2, y_2) \)
- \( G(x_3, y_3) \)
- \( H(x_4, y_4) \)
After dilation, the new coordinates will be:
- \( E'(3x_1, 3y_1) \)
- \( F'(3x_2, 3y_2) \)
- \( G'(3x_3, 3y_3) \)
- \( H'(3x_4, 3y_4) \)
Since we don't have the original coordinates (E, F, G, H) provided in your question, we cannot calculate the new coordinates directly. However, we can look at the answer choices you provided and check which one is consistent with dilation by a factor of 3 from a set of coordinates that might reasonably represent a parallelogram.
Here are the choices:
- E′(−4,2), F′(−1,5), G′(1,1) and H′(−2,−2)
- E′(−13,53), F′(23,83), G′(43,43) and H′(13,13)
- E′(−3,15), F′(6,24), G′(12,12) and H′(3,3)
- E′(2,8), F′(5,11), G′(7,7) and H′(4,4)
Looking at the proportions, the second choice seems to have extremely large values that likely wouldn't originate from an integer coordinate set within the bounds of (-8 to 8). The first set appears small, but relatively more consistent than the others given no visible pattern of dilation. The third option appears quite large and does not look appropriate for a simple dilation. The fourth option is moderate in size but not likely representative.
Given that there is no direct correspondence without known original coordinates, the task's completion hinges on the original coordinates. If you know the original coordinates, please provide them, and we can help find the new coordinates.
For the given answers with multiple choices, one might infer that without main coordinates or original references, answering accurately is complex.
Could you please confirm the initial coordinates of vertices E, F, G, H?