The reasoning supporting the claim that "Our town should double its fines for speeding" has some logical flaws. While studies may indicate that higher fines can deter speeding, the assumption that all drivers who speed can easily afford to pay higher fines is problematic; not all individuals have the same financial capabilities, and increased fines could disproportionately impact lower-income drivers. Additionally, the argument fails to consider potential negative consequences, such as public backlash or a decline in community relations with law enforcement, which could arise from such a policy. Thus, while the goal of improving safety is valid, the approach of simply doubling fines may not be the most equitable or effective solution.
Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fine as well.
How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim “Our town should double its fines for speeding”? Explain your response in 3 to 5 sentences
1 answer