The reasoning behind the claim that "Our town should double its fines for speeding" has some merit but is not entirely sound. While it is true that higher fines may deter speeding, the assumption that those who can afford a $50 fine can also easily afford a $100 fine does not consider varying economic situations. Some drivers may prioritize spending differently, and a doubled fine could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, potentially leading to broader social inequities. Additionally, the reasoning lacks consideration of other factors that contribute to speeding and safety, such as enforcement practices and public awareness campaigns. Therefore, while higher fines could be effective, the argument oversimplifies the issue.
Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fine as well
How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim “Our town should double its fines for speeding”? Explain your response in 3 to 5 sentences.
(4 points)
1 answer
1 answer