Our town should double its fines for speeding. Studies show that higher fines result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety. There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a $50 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fine as well.
How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim “Our town should double its fines for speeding”? Explain your response in 5 sentences.
3 answers
The reasoning given to support the claim that the town should double its fines for speeding is somewhat sound but has some flaws. The claim is supported by the argument that studies show higher fines result in less speeding, implying an improvement in safety. However, the argument does not provide specific evidence or references to these studies, making it difficult to assess their reliability. Additionally, the assumption that doubling the fines will automatically result in less speeding may not be accurate, as there are various factors involved in speeding behaviors. Moreover, equating the affordability of a $50 fine to a $100 fine overlooks individual financial circumstances and assumes everyone can equally afford the increased penalty. Overall, while the reasoning has some merit, it lacks concrete evidence and oversimplifies the relationship between fines and speeding behavior.
can you make it shorter?
The reasoning given to support the claim is somewhat sound but has some flaws. It states that higher fines result in less speeding, implying improved safety. However, there is no specific evidence provided for this claim. Additionally, assuming that doubling fines will automatically reduce speeding overlooks other factors that contribute to speeding behavior. Lastly, equating the affordability of a $50 fine to a $100 fine oversimplifies individual financial circumstances.
1 answer