The reasoning to support the claim that "our town should double its fines for speeding" is based on the assumption that higher fines will deter speeding behavior and enhance safety. However, this argument overlooks the potential financial burden on individuals who may not be able to afford the increased penalties, which could lead to resentment or non-compliance rather than compliance. Therefore, while the intention is to improve safety, the effectiveness of simply raising fines as a solution is questionable without considering the broader social and economic impacts.
Our town should be double its benifits for speeding. Studies show that teh higher fines result in less spending so increasing the fees should improve saftey there is no reason to do this if people can afford to pay a $50 fine the shurley they shoud be able to pay a $100 fine as well.
How sound is the reasoning to suppport the claim "our town should double its fines for speeding" explain in 3 sentences
1 answer