The reasoning is flawed because it assumes that those who can afford a $550 fine would also be deterred by a higher fee, which may not take into account individuals' varied financial situations or the potential for fines to be perceived as a cost rather than a deterrent. Additionally, while studies may show a correlation between higher fines and reduced speeding, they do not establish a direct causal relationship, nor do they consider other factors influencing driving behavior. Lastly, increasing fines may disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, which raises ethical concerns around fairness and effectiveness in promoting road safety.
Our lown should double ita fines for speeding. Studies show that higher thes result in less speeding, so increasing the fees should improve safety There is no reason not to do this. If people can afford to pay a 550 fine, then surely they should be able to pay a $100 fie as well.
How sound is the reasoning given to support the claim "Our town should double its fines for speeding? Explain your response in 3 short sentences
1 answer
1 answer