Second article: The solar installation project at Thomas Edison High School in Queens isn't as effective as it could be. In fact, 35 percent of the school's energy consumption isn't supported by the solar panels at all.
What is the key difference in how the two texts interpret the facts differently?
(1 point)
Responses
The second article is more objective.
The second article is more objective.
The second article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system
The second article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system
The original article uses more emotional language to explain the impact of solar energy.
The original article uses more emotional language to explain the impact of solar energy.
The original article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system
The original article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system
Skip to navigation
1 answer
The key difference in how the two texts interpret the facts differently is:
The second article has a less favorable explanation of how solar energy is benefitting the school system.
The first article presents a positive view by highlighting that the solar installation meets 65 percent of the school's energy consumption, while the second article focuses on the 35 percent that is not supported by solar energy, emphasizing a less favorable outcome.
9 answers
0 answers
1 answer
1 answer