On June 1, Jen enters into an oral contract to work as a sales consultant for B&O. Employment is to begin on Sep. 1. On June 31, Jen receives a letter signed by B&O's President stating that the company is revoking the employment contract entered into on June 1, because they have decided to employ a Phile consulting firm rather than hire a full-time consultant. It will not be necessary for her to report to work and they will not be paying the agreed-upon salary of $25,000. The employment contract

a. Is unenforceable because it violates the Statute of Frauds
b. Is enforceable because Jen made part performance
c. Is valid and enforceable by Jen
d. Is unforceable because it violates the Statute of Limitations

I think D

Claims not discharged by backruptcy are
a. those resulting from intentional torts
b. loads from federal
c. taken for alimony and child support

I think all above

2 answers

The first is an instance that the contract had to be in writing.

Yes, all of those.
so the first answer not D?