Of the two French attempts to colonize South Carolina, evaluate which was more successful, and why.(1 point) Responses The first attempt was more successful because the settlers built a lasting settlement at Charlesfort. The first attempt was more successful because the settlers built a lasting settlement at Charlesfort. The second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the Spanish. The second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the Spanish. The second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the English. The second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the English. The first attempt was more successful because the settlers survived in South Carolina with the help of the English. The first attempt was more successful because the settlers survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.

Answer 1

To evaluate the success of the two French attempts to colonize South Carolina, it is important to look at the outcomes of each initiative.

1. First Attempt (Charlesfort): Established in 1562 by the French under Jean Ribault, Charlesfort was located on Parris Island. However, this settlement ultimately failed. The settlers faced harsh conditions, dwindling supplies, and conflicts with local Indigenous populations. The colony was abandoned after only a year, and many of those who remained either died or returned to France.

2. Second Attempt (Fort de la Caroline): This was established in 1564 by a group of Huguenots led by René Goulaine de Laudonnière. The settlement faced challenges as well but had a stronger infrastructure and support system from the Spanish. While it struggled, it was in existence longer than Charlesfort and managed to incorporate relationships with some Indigenous tribes. Eventually, the colony was also abandoned, largely due to tensions with the Spanish and lack of supplies.

Given the factors at play:

• The first attempt failed almost immediately after its establishment and did not lead to a lasting settlement.
• The second attempt lasted longer, had more structured support, and built alliances that provided some level of survival for its inhabitants despite ultimately failing.

Thus, the second attempt was more successful in terms of longevity and the ability to maintain a presence in the region, even if it ultimately did not lead to a sustainable colony.