The first attempt was more successful because the settlers built a lasting settlement at Charlesfort. Although the French settlement at Charlesfort (founded in 1562) did not ultimately thrive and was abandoned after a year, it marked a significant effort to establish a French presence in the area. In contrast, the second attempt by the Huguenots in the 16th century was less successful as they faced numerous challenges and ultimately did not establish a long-term settlement.
Of the two French attempts to colonize South Carolina, evaluate which was more successful, and why.(1 point)
Responses
The second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the Spanish.
The second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the Spanish.
The first attempt was more successful because the settlers survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.
The first attempt was more successful because the settlers survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.
The second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.
The second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.
The first attempt was more successful because the settlers built a lasting settlement at Charlesfort.
1 answer