Of the two French attempts to colonize South Carolina, evaluate which was more successful, and why.(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AThe first attempt was more successful because the settlers survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.%0D%0AThe first attempt was more successful because the settlers survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the Spanish.%0D%0AThe second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the Spanish.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe first attempt was more successful because the settlers built a lasting settlement at Charlesfort.%0D%0AThe first attempt was more successful because the settlers built a lasting settlement at Charlesfort.%0D%0A%0D%0AThe second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.%0D%0AThe second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the English.

Answer 1

To evaluate the success of the two French attempts to colonize South Carolina, we can look at key factors such as settlement longevity, support from other powers, and overall impact.

1. The First Attempt (1562, Charlesfort): The French established Charlesfort, which was one of their initial attempts to colonize the region. However, this settlement ultimately failed due to lack of sufficient resources, conflicts with Indigenous peoples, and the absence of support from France. While Charlesfort was built, it did not become a lasting settlement as it was abandoned after only a year.

2. The Second Attempt (1670s, Huguenot Settlement): The second attempt involved a group of Huguenots who, fleeing persecution in France, settled in the area. They established a more sustainable community and were able to secure some support from the English, who were already established nearby. This attempt, although initially facing difficulties, ultimately led to a more lasting presence in South Carolina.

In conclusion, the second attempt was more successful due to the establishment of a more durable settlement by the Huguenots, as well as their ability to integrate and survive with the assistance of the English, compared to the lack of lasting impact from the first attempt at Charlesfort.

Answer 2

what is the answer

Answer 3

The answer is that the second attempt was more successful because the Huguenots survived in South Carolina with the help of the English. This settlement led to a more lasting presence in the region compared to the first attempt at Charlesfort, which ultimately failed shortly after its establishment.