Let's say there are "x" total cars in the lot.
2/5 of the cars are gray, which means there are 2/5*x gray cars.
1/3 of the gray cars are electrically powered, which means there are (1/3)*(2/5*x) = (2/15)*x gray and electrically powered cars.
The fraction of cars that are both gray and electrically powered is therefore (2/15)*x / x = 2/15.
The simplest form of this fraction is 2/15. Answer: \boxed{\frac{2}{15}}.
Of the cars in a used-car lot, 2/5 are the color 1/3 the gray cars are electrically powered vehicles. What fraction of th cars on the lot are both gray and electrically powered? Leave your answer in simplified fraction form.
39 answers
Lake Profondo has a depth of 84 feet. Lake Segundo is 56 as deep. What is the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo? (Remember, the elevation is below sea level. Account for this in your answer.)
Since both lakes' depths are given in feet and we assume that sea level is at 0 feet, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo would be -56 feet. This negative sign indicates that the elevation is below sea level. So, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo is -56 feet. Answer: \boxed{-56}.
Lake Profondo has a depth of 8/4 feet. Lake Segundo is 5/6 as deep. What is the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo? (Remember, the elevation is below sea level. Account for this in your answer.)
Lake Profondo has a depth of 8/4 feet, which simplifies to 2 feet. Lake Segundo is 5/6 as deep as Lake Profondo, so its depth is (5/6) * 2 = 10/6 feet, which simplifies to 5/3 feet.
To determine the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo, we need to consider that sea level is at 0 feet. Since the depths of both lakes are below sea level, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo would be -5/3 feet. This negative sign indicates that the elevation is below sea level.
So, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo is -5/3 feet. Answer: \boxed{-\frac{5}{3}}.
To determine the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo, we need to consider that sea level is at 0 feet. Since the depths of both lakes are below sea level, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo would be -5/3 feet. This negative sign indicates that the elevation is below sea level.
So, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo is -5/3 feet. Answer: \boxed{-\frac{5}{3}}.
Lake Profondo has a depth of 84 feet. Lake Segundo is 5/6 as deep. What is the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo? (Remember, the elevation is below sea level. Account for this in your answer.)
To find the depth of Lake Segundo, we can multiply the depth of Lake Profondo by 5/6:
Depth of Lake Segundo = (5/6) * 84 feet = (5 * 84) / 6 feet = 420 / 6 feet = 70 feet.
Since the depth of Lake Segundo is below sea level, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo would be -70 feet. The negative sign indicates that the elevation is below sea level.
Therefore, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo is -70 feet. Answer: \boxed{-70}.
Depth of Lake Segundo = (5/6) * 84 feet = (5 * 84) / 6 feet = 420 / 6 feet = 70 feet.
Since the depth of Lake Segundo is below sea level, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo would be -70 feet. The negative sign indicates that the elevation is below sea level.
Therefore, the elevation at the bottom of Lake Segundo is -70 feet. Answer: \boxed{-70}.
Divide −72 by −4. Then divide the quotient by −9. What is the final quotient?
When we divide -72 by -4, we get a quotient of 18.
Now, we divide the quotient (18) by -9.
18 ÷ -9 = -2
Therefore, the final quotient is -2. Answer: \boxed{-2}.
Now, we divide the quotient (18) by -9.
18 ÷ -9 = -2
Therefore, the final quotient is -2. Answer: \boxed{-2}.
What is the quotient of 100÷(−10)÷5?(1 point)
Responses
−50
negative 50
−200
negative 200
−2
negative 2
2
Responses
−50
negative 50
−200
negative 200
−2
negative 2
2
To find the quotient of 100÷(-10)÷5, we can perform the divisions sequentially.
First, we divide 100 by -10:
100 ÷ (-10) = -10
Next, we divide the result (-10) by 5:
-10 ÷ 5 = -2
Therefore, the final quotient is -2. Answer: \boxed{-2}.
First, we divide 100 by -10:
100 ÷ (-10) = -10
Next, we divide the result (-10) by 5:
-10 ÷ 5 = -2
Therefore, the final quotient is -2. Answer: \boxed{-2}.
What is the quotient of 842.4 ÷ −0.6?(1 point)
Responses
1,404
1,404
−14.04
negative 14.04
−140.4
negative 140.4
−1,404
Responses
1,404
1,404
−14.04
negative 14.04
−140.4
negative 140.4
−1,404
To find the quotient of 842.4 ÷ -0.6, we divide the numerator (842.4) by the denominator (-0.6).
842.4 ÷ -0.6 = -1,404
Therefore, the quotient is -1,404. Answer: \boxed{-1,404}.
842.4 ÷ -0.6 = -1,404
Therefore, the quotient is -1,404. Answer: \boxed{-1,404}.
What is 4.65 converted to a fraction? The answer should be given in simplest form.(1 point)
Responses
41320
4 Start Fraction 13 over 20 End Fraction
465
4 Start Fraction 6 over 5 End Fraction
465100
4 Start Fraction 65 over 100 End Fraction
465
Responses
41320
4 Start Fraction 13 over 20 End Fraction
465
4 Start Fraction 6 over 5 End Fraction
465100
4 Start Fraction 65 over 100 End Fraction
465
To convert 4.65 to a fraction, we observe that the number has two decimal places. To convert a decimal with two decimal places to a fraction, we place the decimal part (65) over the appropriate power of ten, which in this case is 100:
4.65 = 4 + 0.65 = 4 + 65/100
Simplifying the fraction 65/100, we can divide both the numerator and denominator by 5:
65/100 = (65 ÷ 5) / (100 ÷ 5) = 13/20
Therefore, 4.65 can be expressed as the fraction 4 + 13/20.
Answer: \boxed{4 \frac{13}{20}}.
4.65 = 4 + 0.65 = 4 + 65/100
Simplifying the fraction 65/100, we can divide both the numerator and denominator by 5:
65/100 = (65 ÷ 5) / (100 ÷ 5) = 13/20
Therefore, 4.65 can be expressed as the fraction 4 + 13/20.
Answer: \boxed{4 \frac{13}{20}}.
Use long division to convert 2716 to a decimal.(1 point)
Responses
0.4375
0.4375
2.4375
2.4375
2.2857
2.2857
2.716
2.716
Responses
0.4375
0.4375
2.4375
2.4375
2.2857
2.2857
2.716
2.716
To convert 2716 to a decimal using long division, we divide 2716 by 10000 (since there are four decimal places):
0.2716
----------------
10000 | 2716
The result of this division is 0.2716.
Therefore, 2716 as a decimal is 0.2716. Answer: \boxed{0.2716}.
0.2716
----------------
10000 | 2716
The result of this division is 0.2716.
Therefore, 2716 as a decimal is 0.2716. Answer: \boxed{0.2716}.
wrong its b
Apologies for the mistake. Let's perform long division to convert 2716 to a decimal:
```
0.2716
-----------------
10000 | 2716
-2716
------
0
```
The result of this division is 0.2716.
Therefore, 2716 as a decimal is 0.2716. Answer: \boxed{0.2716}.
```
0.2716
-----------------
10000 | 2716
-2716
------
0
```
The result of this division is 0.2716.
Therefore, 2716 as a decimal is 0.2716. Answer: \boxed{0.2716}.
Multiply & Divide Rational Numbers Unit Test
11 of 1511 of 15 Items
Question
Use long division to convert 6 7/15 to a decimal.(1 point)
Responses
≈6.47
approximately equals 6.47
≈6.14285
approximately equals 6.14285
6.715
6.715
≈0.46
approximately equals 0.46
11 of 1511 of 15 Items
Question
Use long division to convert 6 7/15 to a decimal.(1 point)
Responses
≈6.47
approximately equals 6.47
≈6.14285
approximately equals 6.14285
6.715
6.715
≈0.46
approximately equals 0.46
To convert 6 7/15 to a decimal using long division, we perform the division as follows:
```
7
______
15 | 6 1
6 0
---
10
```
The division result is 6 with a remainder of 10. However, since we are converting to a decimal, we can continue the division by adding zeros after the decimal point:
```
7 | 10.000
- 7
30
- 28
20
- 14
60
- 56
40
- 35
50
- 49
10
```
The division process repeats indefinitely with a repeating pattern of 6 digits (142857), so we use an overline to indicate the repeating part:
```
6 7/15 ≈ 6.142857...
```
Therefore, 6 7/15 as a decimal is approximately equal to 6.14285. Answer: ≈6.14285.
```
7
______
15 | 6 1
6 0
---
10
```
The division result is 6 with a remainder of 10. However, since we are converting to a decimal, we can continue the division by adding zeros after the decimal point:
```
7 | 10.000
- 7
30
- 28
20
- 14
60
- 56
40
- 35
50
- 49
10
```
The division process repeats indefinitely with a repeating pattern of 6 digits (142857), so we use an overline to indicate the repeating part:
```
6 7/15 ≈ 6.142857...
```
Therefore, 6 7/15 as a decimal is approximately equal to 6.14285. Answer: ≈6.14285.
A pilot is flying an airplane. Due to strong winds, the pilot decides to fly 4,000 feet lower to avoid excessive turbulence. It takes the pilot 3.5 minutes to make this adjustment. Interpret the quotient to describe the rate of change in the plane’s altitude. Give your answer to the nearest hundredth, and remember the plane is descending.(1 point)
The quotient that best represents the rate of change in the plane’s altitude is
feet/minute.
The quotient that best represents the rate of change in the plane’s altitude is
feet/minute.
To find the rate of change in the plane's altitude, we divide the change in altitude (4,000 feet) by the time it takes to make the adjustment (3.5 minutes):
Rate of change = Change in altitude / Time
Rate of change = 4000 feet / 3.5 minutes
Calculating this division gives us approximately 1142.86 feet/minute.
Therefore, the quotient that best represents the rate of change in the plane's altitude is approximately 1142.86 feet/minute. Answer: \boxed{1142.86 \text{ feet/minute}}.
Rate of change = Change in altitude / Time
Rate of change = 4000 feet / 3.5 minutes
Calculating this division gives us approximately 1142.86 feet/minute.
Therefore, the quotient that best represents the rate of change in the plane's altitude is approximately 1142.86 feet/minute. Answer: \boxed{1142.86 \text{ feet/minute}}.
Solve the following word problem. A fish is swimming at −10.8 meters, or 10.8 meters below sea level. Every 2 minutes it descends another 1.5 meters. How long will it take for the fish to reach a depth of −37.8 meters? Show your work and write a sentence to explain what your answer means
Given that the fish descends 1.5 meters every 2 minutes, we can find the number of times the fish needs to descend 1.5 meters to reach a depth of -37.8 meters.
To find the number of descents, we calculate the difference between the starting depth (-10.8 meters) and the target depth (-37.8 meters):
Difference = -37.8 meters - (-10.8 meters)
Difference = -37.8 meters + 10.8 meters
Difference = -27 meters
To find the number of descents, we divide the difference by the descent rate:
Number of descents = Difference / Descent rate
Number of descents = -27 meters / 1.5 meters/2 minutes
Number of descents = -27 meters / 0.75 meters/minute
Number of descents ≈ -36
Since each descent takes 2 minutes, the total time it will take for the fish to reach a depth of -37.8 meters is:
Total time = Number of descents × Time per descent
Total time = -36 descents × 2 minutes/descent
Total time = -72 minutes
Since time cannot be negative, we consider the absolute value of the total time:
Total time ≈ 72 minutes
Therefore, it will take approximately 72 minutes for the fish to reach a depth of -37.8 meters.
This means that the fish will descend at a rate of 1.5 meters every 2 minutes until it reaches a depth of -37.8 meters below sea level, which will take approximately 72 minutes.
To find the number of descents, we calculate the difference between the starting depth (-10.8 meters) and the target depth (-37.8 meters):
Difference = -37.8 meters - (-10.8 meters)
Difference = -37.8 meters + 10.8 meters
Difference = -27 meters
To find the number of descents, we divide the difference by the descent rate:
Number of descents = Difference / Descent rate
Number of descents = -27 meters / 1.5 meters/2 minutes
Number of descents = -27 meters / 0.75 meters/minute
Number of descents ≈ -36
Since each descent takes 2 minutes, the total time it will take for the fish to reach a depth of -37.8 meters is:
Total time = Number of descents × Time per descent
Total time = -36 descents × 2 minutes/descent
Total time = -72 minutes
Since time cannot be negative, we consider the absolute value of the total time:
Total time ≈ 72 minutes
Therefore, it will take approximately 72 minutes for the fish to reach a depth of -37.8 meters.
This means that the fish will descend at a rate of 1.5 meters every 2 minutes until it reaches a depth of -37.8 meters below sea level, which will take approximately 72 minutes.
dude just write it for 3 sentences MAKE IT SIMPLE
The fish descends 1.5 meters every 2 minutes. To reach a depth of -37.8 meters, it needs to descend an additional 27 meters. Since each descent takes 2 minutes, it will take approximately 72 minutes for the fish to reach the desired depth.
A fire engine’s water tank holds 750 gallons of water. If the pump removes 250 gallons of water in 5 minutes, what is the change in the amount of water in gallons in 1 minute?(1 point)
Responses
−50
negative 50
50
50
−15
negative 15
15
Responses
−50
negative 50
50
50
−15
negative 15
15
To find the change in the amount of water in 1 minute, we can calculate the rate at which water is being removed from the tank.
In 5 minutes, the pump removes 250 gallons of water.
Therefore, in 1 minute, the pump would remove 250 gallons divided by 5, which equals 50 gallons.
Hence, the change in the amount of water in 1 minute is 50 gallons.
Answer: \boxed{50}.
In 5 minutes, the pump removes 250 gallons of water.
Therefore, in 1 minute, the pump would remove 250 gallons divided by 5, which equals 50 gallons.
Hence, the change in the amount of water in 1 minute is 50 gallons.
Answer: \boxed{50}.
Use the properties of operations and rules for multiplying and dividing signed numbers to solve:
(−4)×(75)×(−34)÷(715)
(1 point)
Responses
9
9
−9
negative 9
14775
Start Fraction 147 over 75 End Fraction
−14775
(−4)×(75)×(−34)÷(715)
(1 point)
Responses
9
9
−9
negative 9
14775
Start Fraction 147 over 75 End Fraction
−14775
To solve (−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715), we can perform the multiplication and division in the given order:
(−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715) = (-4) × (75) × (-34) ÷ (715)
Using the rule for multiplying signed numbers, the product of two negative numbers is positive:
(-4) × (75) × (-34) ÷ (715) = 4 × 75 × (-34) ÷ (715)
Next, we perform the multiplication:
4 × 75 × (-34) ÷ (715) = 300 × (-34) ÷ (715)
Using the rule for multiplying a positive number by a negative number, the product is negative:
300 × (-34) ÷ (715) = -10200 ÷ (715)
Finally, we perform the division:
-10200 ÷ (715) ≈ -14.24
Therefore, the value of (−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715) is approximately -14.24.
Answer: \boxed{-14.24}.
(−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715) = (-4) × (75) × (-34) ÷ (715)
Using the rule for multiplying signed numbers, the product of two negative numbers is positive:
(-4) × (75) × (-34) ÷ (715) = 4 × 75 × (-34) ÷ (715)
Next, we perform the multiplication:
4 × 75 × (-34) ÷ (715) = 300 × (-34) ÷ (715)
Using the rule for multiplying a positive number by a negative number, the product is negative:
300 × (-34) ÷ (715) = -10200 ÷ (715)
Finally, we perform the division:
-10200 ÷ (715) ≈ -14.24
Therefore, the value of (−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715) is approximately -14.24.
Answer: \boxed{-14.24}.
Use the properties of operations and rules for multiplying and dividing signed numbers to solve:
(−4)×(75)×(−34)÷(715)
(−4)×(75)×(−34)÷(715)
To solve (−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715), we can perform the multiplication and division in the given order:
(−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715) = (-4) × (75) × (-34) ÷ (715)
Using the rule for multiplying signed numbers, the product of two negative numbers is positive:
(-4) × (75) × (-34) ÷ (715) = 4 × 75 × (-34) ÷ 715
Next, we perform the multiplication:
4 × 75 × (-34) ÷ 715 = 300 × (-34) ÷ 715
Using the rule for multiplying a positive number by a negative number, the product is negative:
300 × (-34) ÷ 715 = -10200 ÷ 715
Finally, we perform the division:
-10200 ÷ 715 = -14.265
Therefore, the value of (−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715) is approximately -14.265.
Answer: \boxed{-14.265}.
(−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715) = (-4) × (75) × (-34) ÷ (715)
Using the rule for multiplying signed numbers, the product of two negative numbers is positive:
(-4) × (75) × (-34) ÷ (715) = 4 × 75 × (-34) ÷ 715
Next, we perform the multiplication:
4 × 75 × (-34) ÷ 715 = 300 × (-34) ÷ 715
Using the rule for multiplying a positive number by a negative number, the product is negative:
300 × (-34) ÷ 715 = -10200 ÷ 715
Finally, we perform the division:
-10200 ÷ 715 = -14.265
Therefore, the value of (−4) × (75) × (−34) ÷ (715) is approximately -14.265.
Answer: \boxed{-14.265}.
A fire engine’s water tank holds 750 gallons of water. If the pump removes 250 gallons of water in 5 minutes, what is the change in the amount of water in gallons in 1 minute?
To find the change in the amount of water in 1 minute, we can divide the amount of water removed in 5 minutes (250 gallons) by 5:
Change in water in 1 minute = 250 gallons / 5
Change in water in 1 minute = 50 gallons
Therefore, the change in the amount of water in 1 minute is 50 gallons. Answer: \boxed{50}.
Change in water in 1 minute = 250 gallons / 5
Change in water in 1 minute = 50 gallons
Therefore, the change in the amount of water in 1 minute is 50 gallons. Answer: \boxed{50}.
its negative 50 bot
I apologize for the previous incorrect response. Since the pump removes water from the fire engine's tank, the change in the amount of water in 1 minute should be negative.
To find the change in the amount of water in 1 minute, we can divide the amount of water removed in 5 minutes (250 gallons) by 5:
Change in water in 1 minute = 250 gallons / 5
Change in water in 1 minute = 50 gallons
Since the water is being removed, the change in the amount of water in 1 minute is negative. Therefore, the correct answer is: \boxed{-50}.
To find the change in the amount of water in 1 minute, we can divide the amount of water removed in 5 minutes (250 gallons) by 5:
Change in water in 1 minute = 250 gallons / 5
Change in water in 1 minute = 50 gallons
Since the water is being removed, the change in the amount of water in 1 minute is negative. Therefore, the correct answer is: \boxed{-50}.
Which of the following sentences demonstrate correct subject-verb agreement? (1 point)
Responses
The children visit their grandparents last weekend.
The children visit their grandparents last weekend.
The visited their grandparents last weekend.
The visited their grandparents last weekend.
They visit their grandparents last weekend.
They visit their grandparents last weekend.
The children visited their grandparents last weekend.
Responses
The children visit their grandparents last weekend.
The children visit their grandparents last weekend.
The visited their grandparents last weekend.
The visited their grandparents last weekend.
They visit their grandparents last weekend.
They visit their grandparents last weekend.
The children visited their grandparents last weekend.
The correct sentence that demonstrates subject-verb agreement is:
"The children visited their grandparents last weekend."
In this sentence, the subject "children" is plural, and the verb "visited" agrees with it in past tense form. Answer: "The children visited their grandparents last weekend."
"The children visited their grandparents last weekend."
In this sentence, the subject "children" is plural, and the verb "visited" agrees with it in past tense form. Answer: "The children visited their grandparents last weekend."