In Act 3, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar," the funeral orations delivered by Brutus and Antony serve as pivotal moments in the play, highlighting the struggle for public opinion following Caesar's assassination. Both speeches aim to sway the Roman citizens regarding the justification of Caesar's murder; however, they take markedly different approaches. Firstly, Brutus appeals to reason and logic, asserting that his love for Rome compelled him to kill Caesar, whom he viewed as a potential tyrant. He emphasizes his honor and seeks to reflect the nobility of his motives, suggesting that it was Caesar’s ambition that posed a danger to the republic. Conversely, Antony employs emotional persuasion, invoking the citizens' feelings of loyalty and grief toward Caesar. He repeatedly refers to Caesar’s kindness and his refusal of the crown, gradually inciting pity and outrage among the crowd. While both orations ultimately aim to either justify or condemn the assassination, they diverge significantly in their methods; Brutus appeals to rational thought, whereas Antony capitalizes on emotional resonance, ultimately leading to a powerful shift in public sentiment.
Now that you have read act 3, scene 2, it is important to compare the central ideas that Brutus and Antony convey to the audience at Caesar’s funeral.
In a well-structured paragraph, state the topic of the funeral orations of Brutus and Antony. Then state how the speeches are similar, and end your paragraph outlining the differences between the speeches. Use transition words to connect supporting details.
1 answer
1 answer