Neutrality is no longer feasible or desirable where the peace of the world is involved and the freedom of its peoples.

Question

—War message to Congress,
Woodrow Wilson

How does Wilson use the meaning of the word freedom to justify war?

Answer 1

In his war message to Congress, Woodrow Wilson employs the concept of "freedom" as a central justification for entering World War I. He associates freedom not merely with individual rights but with larger, collective aspirations for self-determination and democratic governance across nations.

Wilson argues that neutrality is inadequate in the face of threats to global peace and the autonomy of nations. By framing the conflict in terms of the struggle for freedom, he positions the war as a moral imperative. He portrays the Central Powers as forces that oppress and undermine the liberty of peoples, while the Allies embody the values of democracy and self-governance. This dichotomy presents the war as a fight to protect and extend freedom, which he views as a universal principle that justifies intervention.

Wilson’s rhetoric suggests that the preservation and promotion of freedom are not only necessary for American security but also for the greater good of humanity. He implies that inaction in the face of tyranny would be a betrayal of these ideals, thus making a compelling case for the necessity of war. By invoking freedom as a cause, Wilson seeks to rally public support and legitimize the United States' involvement in the war as a principled stand for justice and human rights.

Answer 2

Which of the following did you include in your response? Check any of the boxes that apply.

the denotation of freedom

the connotation of freedom

the emotional effect on the audience

the change in meaning over the course of the text

the fact that freedom means many things to many people

Answer 3

In my response, I included the following points:

• the connotation of freedom: I discussed how Wilson framed freedom in a collective context, relating it to democracy and self-determination, thereby highlighting its broader implications.

• the emotional effect on the audience: I addressed how Wilson’s use of the concept of freedom served to rally public support and present the war as a moral imperative, which would evoke a strong emotional response from his audience.

• the fact that freedom means many things to many people: I touched on the universal nature of freedom as presented by Wilson, suggesting that it encompasses individual rights as well as collective aspirations.

I did not specifically include:

• the denotation of freedom: I didn’t focus on the literal dictionary definition of freedom.

• the change in meaning over the course of the text: I did not examine any shifts in meaning throughout the text.

If you have any further clarifications or need additional information, feel free to ask!

Answer 4

Which of the following statements best summarizes the central idea of Woodrow Wilson’s speech?

The United States has no choice but to enter the war because of hostile actions by the Germans.

The Central Powers have declared war on the United States.

The United States must act first or it will be attacked.

The United States must enter the war to protect its right to free trade.

Answer 5

The statement that best summarizes the central idea of Woodrow Wilson’s speech is:

The United States has no choice but to enter the war because of hostile actions by the Germans.

Wilson emphasizes the threats posed by German actions, particularly unrestricted submarine warfare and aggressive military tactics, which endanger not only American lives and commerce but also the broader principles of democracy and freedom that the U.S. stands for. His rationale for entering the war is rooted in responding to these hostile actions rather than preemptive measures or trade concerns.

Answer 6

How does Woodrow Wilson make his central idea more persuasive?

He argues that free trade and unrestricted commerce is the best way to ensure peace.

He argues that the German people want peace and would welcome US intervention.

He claims that the United States is now a major power and must restore peace.

He concludes by arguing that only war can ensure others the peace and freedom that Americans enjoy.

Answer 7

The option that best describes how Woodrow Wilson makes his central idea more persuasive is:

He concludes by arguing that only war can ensure others the peace and freedom that Americans enjoy.

By framing the conflict as not just a matter of national interest but as a moral obligation to protect and promote freedom and democracy globally, Wilson appeals to the values and ideals that resonate with his audience. He posits that the U.S. must enter the war to secure peace and freedom not only for itself but also for oppressed peoples around the world. This broader, ethical perspective strengthens his argument, making it more compelling to a populace that values liberty and justice.