NALYZATION QUESTION: Which of the following responses below BEST helps to complete the R.A.C.E (restate, answer, cite evidence, explain evidence) for responding to the following prompt:

Question

In 1-2 sentences, explain the relationship of the analogy below.

tire : bicycle :: window : house

(2 points)
Responses

The relationship here is that bikes are needed just like homes are needed. People need tires on a bike and houses usually require windows.
The relationship here is that bikes are needed just like homes are needed. People need tires on a bike and houses usually require windows.

There is no relationship for this analogy.
There is no relationship for this analogy.

The relationship of the analogy is part-to-whole; a tire is a part of a bicycle, just like a window is a part of a house.
The relationship of the analogy is part-to-whole; a tire is a part of a bicycle, just like a window is a part of a house.

The relationship of the analogy is antonyms because a tire and a window are opposites.

Answer 1

The best response that completes the R.A.C.E. format for the given analogy prompt is:

"The relationship of the analogy is part-to-whole; a tire is a part of a bicycle, just like a window is a part of a house."

This response clearly restates the analogy relationship (part-to-whole) and provides a clear and accurate explanation of how a tire relates to a bicycle in the same way a window relates to a house, effectively fulfilling the R.A.C.E. structure.

The other responses either lack clarity, incorrectly assert the relationship as antonyms, or state that there is no relationship, which does not accurately reflect the intended analogy.