Asked by Melanie
Myra uses an inverse variation function to model the data for the ordered pairs below.
(2, 30), (3, 20), (4, 15), (5, 12), (6, 10)
Which statement best explains whether an inverse variation function is the best model for the data?
An inverse function is the best model because as x increases, y decreases.
An inverse function is the best model because the products of corresponding x- and y-values are equal.
An inverse variation function is not the best model because data points are closer to forming a straight line.
An inverse variation function is not the best model because the data points show an exponential decay.
I got D is that correct??
(2, 30), (3, 20), (4, 15), (5, 12), (6, 10)
Which statement best explains whether an inverse variation function is the best model for the data?
An inverse function is the best model because as x increases, y decreases.
An inverse function is the best model because the products of corresponding x- and y-values are equal.
An inverse variation function is not the best model because data points are closer to forming a straight line.
An inverse variation function is not the best model because the data points show an exponential decay.
I got D is that correct??
Answers
Answered by
Damon
try y = k/x
for (2,30)
30 = k/2
k = 60
for (5,12)
12 = k/5
k = 60 sure enough
x*y always = 60 (answer C)
for (2,30)
30 = k/2
k = 60
for (5,12)
12 = k/5
k = 60 sure enough
x*y always = 60 (answer C)
Answered by
Melanie
nvm its a
Answered by
Damon
NO !!!!!!
a straight line with
y = m x + b
with m negative so negative slope
would satisfy answer A
but the slope of these points is NOT constant
a straight line with
y = m x + b
with m negative so negative slope
would satisfy answer A
but the slope of these points is NOT constant
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.