To determine which table represents a proportional relationship, we need to check whether the ratio of the price to the number of bundles remains constant.
We can calculate the price per bundle for each option.
Option A:
- 15 bundles for $45: \( \frac{45}{15} = 3 \)
- 25 bundles for $75: \( \frac{75}{25} = 3 \)
- 35 bundles for $105: \( \frac{105}{35} = 3 \)
- 50 bundles for $150: \( \frac{150}{50} = 3 \)
- 75 bundles for $225: \( \frac{225}{75} = 3 \)
The ratio is consistent (3) for all bundles. Thus, A represents a proportional relationship.
Option B:
- 15 bundles for $60: \( \frac{60}{15} = 4 \)
- 25 bundles for $100: \( \frac{100}{25} = 4 \)
- 35 bundles for $140: \( \frac{140}{35} = 4 \)
- 50 bundles for $200: \( \frac{200}{50} = 4 \)
- 75 bundles for $225: \( \frac{225}{75} = 3 \)
The ratio changes (from 4 to 3). So, B does not represent a proportional relationship.
Option C:
- 15 bundles for $45: \( \frac{45}{15} = 3 \)
- 25 bundles for $75: \( \frac{75}{25} = 3 \)
- 35 bundles for $105: \( \frac{105}{35} = 3 \)
- 50 bundles for $140: \( \frac{140}{50} = 2.8 \)
- 75 bundles for $205: \( \frac{205}{75} \approx 2.733 \)
The ratios are inconsistent. So, C does not represent a proportional relationship.
Option D:
- 15 bundles for $50: \( \frac{50}{15} \approx 3.33 \)
- 25 bundles for $80: \( \frac{80}{25} = 3.2 \)
- 35 bundles for $110: \( \frac{110}{35} \approx 3.14 \)
- 50 bundles for $155: \( \frac{155}{50} = 3.1 \)
- 75 bundles for $230: \( \frac{230}{75} \approx 3.07 \)
The ratios are inconsistent. So, D does not represent a proportional relationship.
In conclusion, the only option that represents a proportional relationship is Option A.