To simplify the expression \(-32x + 4 + 5a - 7 + a\), we will combine like terms.
-
Identify and combine the constant terms:
- Combine \(4\) and \(-7\):
\[
4 - 7 = -3
\]
-
Identify and combine the \(a\) terms:
- Combine \(5a\) and \(a\):
\[
5a + a = 6a
\]
-
Putting it all together:
The expression simplifies to:
\[
-32x + 6a - 3
\]
Since the expression still contains the term \(-32x\), it indicates that \(x\) is still a part of the expression. None of the answer choices given are purely in terms of \(a\) without the \(x\) term.
However, if we are only considering the \(a\) terms and the constants, we can isolate those:
\[
6a - 3
\]
Now, if we check the answer choices for equivalence without the \(x\) component:
- A. \(3a + 3\) - no match
- B. \(3a - 3\) - no match
- C. \(9a + 3\) - no match
- D. \(9a - 3\) - no match
None of the answer choices appears to directly match the simplified expression \(-32x + 6a - 3\) when looking purely at the \(a\) terms. It seems there may be a lack of clarity in the question or the presence of the \(x\) term may lead to an incomplete conclusion for the asked equivalencies.
If we solely focus on \(6a - 3\) and considering potential misinterpretation of a misprint in the problem or just isolating \(6a - 3\), none of the other answers fit.
However, based on the coefficients and constants relative to the determined expression (for similar character of \(a\)), the approach could lead to different organization but would still uphold the extracted values \(6a\) units alongside that constant of \(-3\).
Thus, finishing the findings implies that there isn't a complete correspondence directly with provided options unless reconsidering or another aspect is absent.
Please clarify or provide additional context if necessary! Otherwise, your simplified expression remains:
\[
-32x + 6a - 3
\] which doesn't match any provided answers.