Asked by coco

Miranda v. Arizona case
how is the 14th amendment implicated in this case? how did the court go beyond its usual practice in coming to a decision?
Answered by Ms. Sue
We'll be glad to critique your answers.
Answered by coco
excuse me?
Answered by Ms. Sue
We don't do homework.

However, if you post your answers, we'll be glad to comment on them.
Answered by Writeacher
http://www.google.com/search?q=Miranda+v.+Arizona+14th+amendment&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GGIE_en

As Ms. Sue said, if you post your answers, we will comment.
Answered by coco
oh ok.
well

I think it implemented the 14th amendemnt by creating the 'miranda warning' where that you have the right to remain silent; that anything you say may be used as evidence against you and the right to know you have the right to an attourney.

but i'm nnot sure on how the court went beyond its USUAL practices.
Answered by Ms. Sue
It implemented the Fifth Amendment about right not to incriminate oneself. The court went beyond its usual practices by being proactive and telling the suspect specifically about his/her rights.
Answered by coco
specifically what does 'incriminating' mean?
Answered by Ms. Sue
From Dictionary.com:

2. to involve in an accusation; cause to be or appear to be guilty; implicate: His testimony incriminated his friend. He feared incriminating himself if he answered.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!