Miranda v. Arizona case
how is the 14th amendment implicated in this case? how did the court go beyond its usual practice in coming to a decision?
8 answers
We'll be glad to critique your answers.
excuse me?
We don't do homework.
However, if you post your answers, we'll be glad to comment on them.
However, if you post your answers, we'll be glad to comment on them.
http://www.google.com/search?q=Miranda+v.+Arizona+14th+amendment&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7GGIE_en
As Ms. Sue said, if you post your answers, we will comment.
As Ms. Sue said, if you post your answers, we will comment.
oh ok.
well
I think it implemented the 14th amendemnt by creating the 'miranda warning' where that you have the right to remain silent; that anything you say may be used as evidence against you and the right to know you have the right to an attourney.
but i'm nnot sure on how the court went beyond its USUAL practices.
well
I think it implemented the 14th amendemnt by creating the 'miranda warning' where that you have the right to remain silent; that anything you say may be used as evidence against you and the right to know you have the right to an attourney.
but i'm nnot sure on how the court went beyond its USUAL practices.
It implemented the Fifth Amendment about right not to incriminate oneself. The court went beyond its usual practices by being proactive and telling the suspect specifically about his/her rights.
specifically what does 'incriminating' mean?
From Dictionary.com:
2. to involve in an accusation; cause to be or appear to be guilty; implicate: His testimony incriminated his friend. He feared incriminating himself if he answered.
2. to involve in an accusation; cause to be or appear to be guilty; implicate: His testimony incriminated his friend. He feared incriminating himself if he answered.
1 answer