Maysa's calculation of \( 3.5 - 2.46 = 1.16 \) is incorrect. To describe her error, let's break down the subtraction step by step.
When we align the numbers vertically for easier subtraction, we have:
3.50
- 2.46
-------
- Starting from the rightmost digits, we first subtract \( 6 \) from \( 0 \). Since \( 0 \) is less than \( 6 \), we cannot subtract directly, so we need to borrow from the next column, which is \( 5 \) in the tenths place. This \( 5 \) becomes \( 4 \), and \( 0 \) becomes \( 10 \).
- Now we perform the subtraction in the hundredths place: \( 10 - 6 = 4 \).
- Moving to the tenths place, we subtract \( 4 \) from \( 4 \): \( 4 - 4 = 0 \).
- Finally, in the ones place, we have \( 3 - 2 = 1 \).
Putting it all together, the answer is:
3.50
- 2.46
-------
1.04
Thus, the correct answer to \( 3.5 - 2.46 \) is \( 1.04 \).
Helping Maysa Build Understanding
To help Maysa understand her error, I would use a model such as base-ten blocks or a place-value chart. Here's how:
-
Place-Value Chart: Create a place-value chart showing the numbers clearly in their respective columns (hundreds, tens, units, tenths, hundredths). Then, explicitly display how borrowing works:
- Show that \( 3.50 \) has \( 0 \) in the hundredths and needs to borrow from the tenths.
- Demonstrate how borrowing converts \( 5 \) into \( 4 \) and adds \( 10 \) to \( 0 \).
-
Base-Ten Blocks: Use physical or drawn base-ten blocks to represent the numbers. For instance:
- Represent \( 3.50 \) with 3 whole blocks and 5 tenths blocks.
- Show \( 2.46 \) with 2 whole blocks, 4 tenths, and 6 hundredths.
- Use the blocks to visually subtract \( 2 \) whole blocks, \( 4 \) tenths, and \( 6 \) hundredths from \( 3.50 \).
-
Practice Problems: Together with Maysa, practice similar problems, slowly ensuring she understands the process of borrowing and how it impacts the values in each column, reinforcing the place-value concept.
By emphasizing the importance of each digit's position and how borrowing affects the numbers, Maysa will gain a clearer understanding of the subtraction process and avoid similar errors in the future.