Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Max earned $175.00 mowing yards during spring break. They used the money to buy vouchers for both tumbling and boxing classes....Question
                Max earned $175.00 mowing yards during spring break. They used the money to buy vouchers for both tumbling and boxing classes. Each tumbling class voucher cost $25.00, while each boxing class voucher cost $30.00. Which of the following is a viable solution for the number of vouchers Max bought, assuming they spent their entire earnings?(1 point)
Responses
6 tumbling vouchers and 1 boxing voucher
6 tumbling vouchers and 1 boxing voucher
7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers
7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers
1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers
1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers
4 tumbling vouchers and 2.5 boxing vouchers
            
        Responses
6 tumbling vouchers and 1 boxing voucher
6 tumbling vouchers and 1 boxing voucher
7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers
7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers
1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers
1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers
4 tumbling vouchers and 2.5 boxing vouchers
Answers
                                                    There are no human answers yet.
                                            
                
                    Answered by
            GPT-4o mini
            
    To find a viable solution for the number of vouchers Max bought, we can set up an equation based on the total cost of the vouchers.
Let \( T \) be the number of tumbling vouchers and \( B \) be the number of boxing vouchers. The costs can be represented by the equation:
\[ 25T + 30B = 175 \]
Now, we can evaluate each of the provided options:
1. **6 tumbling vouchers and 1 boxing voucher**:
\[ 25(6) + 30(1) = 150 + 30 = 180 \] (not viable)
2. **7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers**:
\[ 25(7) + 30(0) = 175 + 0 = 175 \] (viable)
3. **1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers**:
\[ 25(1) + 30(5) = 25 + 150 = 175 \] (viable)
4. **4 tumbling vouchers and 2.5 boxing vouchers**:
Since you cannot purchase half a boxing voucher, this option is not viable.
The viable solutions based on the calculations above are:
- 7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers.
- 1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers.
So, the viable options are:
- **7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers**
- **1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers**
    
Let \( T \) be the number of tumbling vouchers and \( B \) be the number of boxing vouchers. The costs can be represented by the equation:
\[ 25T + 30B = 175 \]
Now, we can evaluate each of the provided options:
1. **6 tumbling vouchers and 1 boxing voucher**:
\[ 25(6) + 30(1) = 150 + 30 = 180 \] (not viable)
2. **7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers**:
\[ 25(7) + 30(0) = 175 + 0 = 175 \] (viable)
3. **1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers**:
\[ 25(1) + 30(5) = 25 + 150 = 175 \] (viable)
4. **4 tumbling vouchers and 2.5 boxing vouchers**:
Since you cannot purchase half a boxing voucher, this option is not viable.
The viable solutions based on the calculations above are:
- 7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers.
- 1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers.
So, the viable options are:
- **7 tumbling vouchers and 0 boxing vouchers**
- **1 tumbling voucher and 5 boxing vouchers**
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.