Question
Matt washed 3 more cars each week than the week before. He washes 6 cars the first week. Write an explicit formula that can be used
Answers
Answer
Not right
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To find an explicit formula for the number of cars Matt washes in week \( n \), we can recognize that the pattern describes an arithmetic sequence.
1. **First Week**: Matt washes 6 cars.
2. **Subsequent Weeks**: Matt washes 3 more cars each week than the week before.
This results in the following sequence for the number of cars washed:
- Week 1: \( 6 \)
- Week 2: \( 6 + 3 = 9 \)
- Week 3: \( 9 + 3 = 12 \)
- Week 4: \( 12 + 3 = 15 \)
- ...
The general term for an arithmetic sequence can be expressed as:
\[
a_n = a_1 + (n - 1) \cdot d
\]
where:
- \( a_n \) is the \( n \)-th term (the number of cars washed in week \( n \)),
- \( a_1 \) is the first term (6 cars),
- \( d \) is the common difference (3 cars),
- \( n \) is the week number.
Substituting the known values:
\[
a_n = 6 + (n - 1) \cdot 3
\]
Now, simplifying this formula:
\[
a_n = 6 + 3n - 3
\]
\[
a_n = 3n + 3
\]
Thus, the explicit formula for the number of cars Matt washes in week \( n \) is:
\[
a_n = 3n + 3
\]
1. **First Week**: Matt washes 6 cars.
2. **Subsequent Weeks**: Matt washes 3 more cars each week than the week before.
This results in the following sequence for the number of cars washed:
- Week 1: \( 6 \)
- Week 2: \( 6 + 3 = 9 \)
- Week 3: \( 9 + 3 = 12 \)
- Week 4: \( 12 + 3 = 15 \)
- ...
The general term for an arithmetic sequence can be expressed as:
\[
a_n = a_1 + (n - 1) \cdot d
\]
where:
- \( a_n \) is the \( n \)-th term (the number of cars washed in week \( n \)),
- \( a_1 \) is the first term (6 cars),
- \( d \) is the common difference (3 cars),
- \( n \) is the week number.
Substituting the known values:
\[
a_n = 6 + (n - 1) \cdot 3
\]
Now, simplifying this formula:
\[
a_n = 6 + 3n - 3
\]
\[
a_n = 3n + 3
\]
Thus, the explicit formula for the number of cars Matt washes in week \( n \) is:
\[
a_n = 3n + 3
\]
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
I apologize for any confusion. Let's reevaluate the formulation based on the information given.
1. **First Week**: Matt washes **6** cars.
2. **After each week**: He washes **3** more cars than the previous week.
- Week 1: \( 6 \) cars.
- Week 2: \( 6 + 3 = 9 \) cars.
- Week 3: \( 9 + 3 = 12 \) cars.
- Week 4: \( 12 + 3 = 15 \) cars.
From this, it looks like we have:
- Week 1: \( 6 \)
- Week 2: \( 6 + 3 \)
- Week 3: \( 6 + 2(3) \)
- Week 4: \( 6 + 3(3) \)
So, the number of cars washed in week \( n \) can be defined as:
\[
a_n = 6 + (n - 1) \cdot 3
\]
Now, let's simplify:
\[
a_n = 6 + 3n - 3
\]
\[
a_n = 3n + 3
\]
It appears that the calculation led to the same formula again. To ensure clarity:
- \( a_1 = 6 \)
- \( a_2 = 9 \)
- \( a_3 = 12 \)
- ...
So the explicit formula for the number of cars washed in week \( n \) is indeed:
\[
a_n = 3n + 3
\]
If there's a specific part you would like to highlight or if there's further context, please let me know!
1. **First Week**: Matt washes **6** cars.
2. **After each week**: He washes **3** more cars than the previous week.
- Week 1: \( 6 \) cars.
- Week 2: \( 6 + 3 = 9 \) cars.
- Week 3: \( 9 + 3 = 12 \) cars.
- Week 4: \( 12 + 3 = 15 \) cars.
From this, it looks like we have:
- Week 1: \( 6 \)
- Week 2: \( 6 + 3 \)
- Week 3: \( 6 + 2(3) \)
- Week 4: \( 6 + 3(3) \)
So, the number of cars washed in week \( n \) can be defined as:
\[
a_n = 6 + (n - 1) \cdot 3
\]
Now, let's simplify:
\[
a_n = 6 + 3n - 3
\]
\[
a_n = 3n + 3
\]
It appears that the calculation led to the same formula again. To ensure clarity:
- \( a_1 = 6 \)
- \( a_2 = 9 \)
- \( a_3 = 12 \)
- ...
So the explicit formula for the number of cars washed in week \( n \) is indeed:
\[
a_n = 3n + 3
\]
If there's a specific part you would like to highlight or if there's further context, please let me know!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.