Match the following human actions to the appropriate climate zone

Question

Group of answer choices
People inhabiting this climate zone should probably carry umbrellas year-round.

[ Choose ]
People inhabiting this climate zone experience four distinct seasons.

[ Choose ]
People inhabiting this climate zone wear winter clothes most of the year.

Answer 1

Read the question carefully and select the best answer.
Which of the following inferences about the 10th Juror is best supported by his dialogue?
Answer choices for the above question

A. He has more money than any of the other jurors.

B. He has bigoted and narrow-minded attitudes about certain groups of people.

C. He doesn’t believe that the defendant should have been tried as an adult.

D. He and his family immigrated to the United States from Germany.

Answer 2

Here are the matches for the human actions to the appropriate climate zones:

1. People inhabiting this climate zone should probably carry umbrellas year-round. Answer: Tropical climate zone

2. People inhabiting this climate zone experience four distinct seasons. Answer: Temperate climate zone

3. People inhabiting this climate zone wear winter clothes most of the year. Answer: Polar climate zone or Subarctic climate zone

Feel free to adjust the last answer based on the specific regions you might be referring to!

Answer 3

To determine the best supported inference about the 10th Juror based on his dialogue, we would need to analyze the specific language and attitudes he expresses in the play. However, since we don't have the actual text to review, I can guide you on how to approach this question.

Typically, if the dialogue contains prejudiced views or makes sweeping generalizations about certain groups of people, then option B. He has bigoted and narrow-minded attitudes about certain groups of people would be the most likely inference.

If the dialogue discusses financial matters or contrasts with the other jurors in wealth, then option A would be more fitting.

If the juror expresses disbelief in the severity of the trial or the way the defendant is treated, then option C could be supported.

Lastly, option D would be valid if there are clues in the dialogue about his family background or immigration experience.

Given how jurors are often characterized in stories as having strong opinions, if you notice any bigotry or narrow-mindedness in his remarks, then option B would be the best choice.