Asked by Nowhen
. Match each description to the Supreme Court case it matches
Lochner v. New York (1905)
Standard Oil Co. v. United States (1911)
Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904)
Options: Found that State limitations on workers' hours violated their freedom to contract. Dissolved a monopoly of the oil industry that had engaged in abusive business practices, upheld breaking up the monopoly controlling the railroad lines from Chicago to the Pacific Northwest.
Lochner v. New York (1905)
Standard Oil Co. v. United States (1911)
Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904)
Options: Found that State limitations on workers' hours violated their freedom to contract. Dissolved a monopoly of the oil industry that had engaged in abusive business practices, upheld breaking up the monopoly controlling the railroad lines from Chicago to the Pacific Northwest.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Here are the matches for each Supreme Court case based on the provided descriptions:
1. **Lochner v. New York (1905)**: Found that State limitations on workers' hours violated their freedom to contract.
2. **Standard Oil Co. v. United States (1911)**: Dissolved a monopoly of the oil industry that had engaged in abusive business practices.
3. **Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904)**: Upheld breaking up the monopoly controlling the railroad lines from Chicago to the Pacific Northwest.
1. **Lochner v. New York (1905)**: Found that State limitations on workers' hours violated their freedom to contract.
2. **Standard Oil Co. v. United States (1911)**: Dissolved a monopoly of the oil industry that had engaged in abusive business practices.
3. **Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904)**: Upheld breaking up the monopoly controlling the railroad lines from Chicago to the Pacific Northwest.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.