To determine a reasonable scale for the domain in the context of this problem, we need to consider the width \( w \) of the fence and how it relates to the area \( A \).
Given the total amount of fencing is 40 yards, the perimeter of the fenced area can be represented as \( 2w + 2l = 40 \), where \( l \) is the length. This can be rearranged to determine the maximum width. To find the maximum possible width if we designate one variable, we can express length \( l \) in terms of width \( w \):
\[ l = 20 - w \]
From that, we see that \( w \) can range from 0 to 20 yards (because if \( w \) were greater than 20, \( l \) would become zero or negative).
Now, if we consider the width \( w \) incrementally, we would typically want to choose a scale that allows us to create a table with enough data points that illustrate the relationship effectively.
A scale of 5 or 10 would give us clear increments without crowding the table with data points that are too close together. In context, choosing increments of 5 would allow us to generate the points (0, 5, 10, 15, 20), which provides a good spread with which to understand the relationship between width \( w \) and area \( A \).
Therefore, the most suitable response from the options given for the reasonable scale for the domain would be 5.