Question

Many people agree with zero-tolerance policies in schools. However, some people disagree with these policies. What is the MOST logical argument against having a zero-tolerance policy?%0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ASometimes students should automatically be suspended if they make a bad choice.%0D%0A%0D%0ASometimes students should automatically be suspended if they make a bad choice.%0D%0A%0D%0ASometimes students deserve to be bullied or harassed by other classmates.%0D%0A%0D%0ASometimes students deserve to be bullied or harassed by other classmates.%0D%0A%0D%0ASome students will go unpunished because they are not caught by a teacher.%0D%0A%0D%0ASome students will go unpunished because they are not caught by a teacher.%0D%0A%0D%0ASome students will be punished because they make an error that meant no harm.

Answer 1

The MOST logical argument against having a zero-tolerance policy is:

Some students will be punished because they make an error that meant no harm.

This argument highlights the concern that zero-tolerance policies can lead to severe punishments for minor infractions or unintentional mistakes, which may not warrant such harsh consequences. It suggests that these policies lack the flexibility to consider the context or intent behind a student's actions.