make an argument for why abstract is not a concept

Answer 1

Sure, let's take a philosophical and logical approach to argue why "abstract" might not be considered a concept. Here are some points to consider:

1. **Ambiguity of Definition**:
- "Abstract" as a term can refer to a process (the act of abstracting), a characteristic (non-concrete nature), or a type of entity (abstract entities like numbers). This ambiguity makes it challenging to pin it down as a single, coherent concept. Concepts typically have clearer, more distinct definitions.

2. **Dependency on Concrete Entities**:
- For something to be considered a concept, it often needs to have a concrete counterpart or at least a clear mental representation. "Abstract," by definition, refers to ideas that are not tied to physical objects or specific instances. Its meaning depends highly on what it is contrasted with (i.e., the concrete), suggesting it's more of a relational term than a standalone concept.

3. **Philosophical Perspectives**:
- Philosophers like Ludwig Wittgenstein argued about the meaning of words being derived from their use in language. "Abstract" may function more as a linguistic tool to delineate boundaries rather than an independent concept. It's descriptive, not designative.

4. **Universality and Specificity**:
- Concepts usually have a certain universality—they apply to multiple instances or can be exemplified clearly. "Abstract," however, is a meta-level term that could be used to describe a wide range of ideas (emotions, numbers, theories) without specificity. Its broadness may disqualify it as a concept, which typically needs a degree of specificity.

5. **Vagueness in Ontology**:
- In ontology, abstract entities are often set apart from concrete entities. If "abstract" is used to mark this distinction, it’s playing more of a categorial or classificatory role. Concepts are usually seen as mental constructs rather than mere category markers.

By analyzing the nature of what "abstract" represents and its role in language and thought, one can argue that it functions more as a descriptor or a classificatory tool rather than a standalone concept.