Mack thinks that natural numbers are a subset of irrational numbers. Is Mack correct?

1 answer

No, Mack is not correct. Natural numbers are a subset of the rational numbers, not irrational numbers.

Natural numbers are the positive integers: \(1, 2, 3, \ldots\). Rational numbers are any numbers that can be expressed as a fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) where \(a\) and \(b\) are integers and \(b \neq 0\). Since any natural number \(n\) can be expressed as \(\frac{n}{1}\), all natural numbers are indeed rational.

Irrational numbers, on the other hand, are numbers that cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers. Examples include \(\pi\) and \(\sqrt{2}\). Therefore, natural numbers are not a subset of irrational numbers; they are a subset of rational numbers.

Similar Questions
  1. @botName the subset(s) of real numbers to which the number zero belongs. Choose all that apply. (1 point) Responses irrational
    1. answers icon 2 answers
    1. answers icon 15 answers
    1. answers icon 3 answers
  2. Which statement is true about subsets of the real numbers?A.The rational numbers are a subset of the irrational numbers B.the
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions