List and discuss philosophers who argued in favour of free will

1 answer

Throughout the history of philosophy, several philosophers have defended the notion of free will, arguing for the capacity of individuals to make choices independent of deterministic constraints. Here is a selection of notable philosophers who supported the concept of free will, along with a discussion of their contributions:

1. René Descartes (1596–1650)

Descartes posited a dualistic view of the mind and body, suggesting that while the physical world operated under deterministic laws, the mind (or soul) possessed the ability to make free choices. He famously stated, "Cogito, ergo sum" ("I think, therefore I am"), emphasizing the role of self-awareness in exercising free will. For Descartes, our ability to doubt or question our existence demonstrated the freedom of thought necessary for moral responsibility.

2. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804)

Kant defended free will within his moral philosophy, arguing that moral laws presuppose freedom. In his "Critique of Practical Reason," he contended that humans must be viewed as autonomous agents capable of making rational choices that align with moral law. He distinguished between the phenomena (the world as we experience it, which may be deterministic) and the noumena (the realm of things-in-themselves, where free will operates). For Kant, moral responsibility requires the belief in free will.

3. Jean-Paul Sartre (1905–1980)

As a leading figure in existentialism, Sartre famously argued that existence precedes essence, meaning that individuals are not born with a predetermined nature but must create themselves through choices. He emphasized radical freedom and the weight of responsibility that comes with it, suggesting that humans are "condemned to be free" and must bear the burden of their decisions without escape. His work, particularly "Being and Nothingness," supports a robust notion of free will in a seemingly indifferent universe.

4. William James (1842–1910)

James, an American philosopher and psychologist, advocated for a pragmatic understanding of free will. He acknowledged the complexities of determinism but suggested that believing in free will is essential for moral action and personal responsibility. In his essay "The Dilemma of Determinism," he proposed that the absence of free will undermines human actions' meaningfulness. He distinguished between different types of truths, suggesting that the pragmatic benefits of believing in free will were significant.

5. Carl Jaspers (1883–1969)

Jaspers, a German philosopher, focused on existential themes, advocating for the concept of "limit situations," which challenge individuals to confront their freedom and responsibility. His work emphasized the idea that through these experiences, people can affirm their freedom in making choices that define themselves, despite the existential angst that accompanies such freedom.

6. Roderick Chisholm (1916–2002)

Chisholm was a key figure in contemporary philosophy who defended libertarian free will, distinguishing it from deterministic and compatibilist views. He argued for agent causation, the idea that agents (individuals) are the ultimate sources of their actions. In works like "Human Freedom and the Self," Chisholm contended that true free will involves a kind of autonomy that is not fully explainable by prior causes, affirming moral responsibility.

7. Robert Kane (b. 1938)

A contemporary philosopher who defends a version of libertarian free will, Kane argues that free will is essential for moral responsibility and that individuals can make morally relevant choices despite the influence of genetics and environment. In "The Significance of Free Will," he postulates the idea of "self-forming actions" (SFAs), where individuals shape their character through their choices, underscoring the dynamic nature of free will.

Conclusion

These philosophers represent a range of arguments in favor of free will, from dualistic metaphysics and moral philosophy to existential claims about human agency. Each contributes to an ongoing dialogue about the nature of freedom, responsibility, and the human condition, highlighting the complexities and significance of free will in understanding moral actions and personal identity.