Question
Line B is a straight line crosses at (0,0)
Line C is a straight line but below line B crosses at (0,-5)
Line moved down 5units
Decreased by factor of 5
Line C is a straight line but below line B crosses at (0,-5)
Line moved down 5units
Decreased by factor of 5
Answers
Answer
No which option
I think moved down 5 units
I think moved down 5 units
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To analyze the situation with lines B and C, let's start by defining what we have:
1. **Line B**: This line crosses at the origin (0,0). Since it's a straight line with a y-intercept of 0, we can express Line B's equation as:
\[
y = mx
\]
where \( m \) is the slope of the line.
2. **Line C**: This line is parallel to Line B but shifted downwards. Since it crosses the y-axis at (0, -5), we can express its equation as:
\[
y = mx - 5
\]
Now let's discuss the operations you've mentioned:
- **Moved down 5 units**: This operation suggests that we are further translating Line C downwards. The new y-intercept of Line C after translating down 5 units would be:
\[
-5 - 5 = -10
\]
Therefore, the equation for the new Line C (let's call it Line C') would be:
\[
y = mx - 10
\]
- **Decreased by factor of 5**: This operation implies that we are scaling the line vertically by a factor of \( \frac{1}{5} \). To scale Line C' by a factor of \( \frac{1}{5} \), we can multiply the entire equation of Line C' by \( \frac{1}{5} \):
\[
y = \frac{1}{5}(mx - 10)
\]
This simplifies to:
\[
y = \frac{m}{5}x - 2
\]
In summary, after moving Line C down by 5 units and then scaling it by a factor of 5, the new equation of Line C becomes:
\[
y = \frac{m}{5}x - 2
\]
If you need anything else, such as specific values for \( m \) or any additional properties of these lines, please let me know!
1. **Line B**: This line crosses at the origin (0,0). Since it's a straight line with a y-intercept of 0, we can express Line B's equation as:
\[
y = mx
\]
where \( m \) is the slope of the line.
2. **Line C**: This line is parallel to Line B but shifted downwards. Since it crosses the y-axis at (0, -5), we can express its equation as:
\[
y = mx - 5
\]
Now let's discuss the operations you've mentioned:
- **Moved down 5 units**: This operation suggests that we are further translating Line C downwards. The new y-intercept of Line C after translating down 5 units would be:
\[
-5 - 5 = -10
\]
Therefore, the equation for the new Line C (let's call it Line C') would be:
\[
y = mx - 10
\]
- **Decreased by factor of 5**: This operation implies that we are scaling the line vertically by a factor of \( \frac{1}{5} \). To scale Line C' by a factor of \( \frac{1}{5} \), we can multiply the entire equation of Line C' by \( \frac{1}{5} \):
\[
y = \frac{1}{5}(mx - 10)
\]
This simplifies to:
\[
y = \frac{m}{5}x - 2
\]
In summary, after moving Line C down by 5 units and then scaling it by a factor of 5, the new equation of Line C becomes:
\[
y = \frac{m}{5}x - 2
\]
If you need anything else, such as specific values for \( m \) or any additional properties of these lines, please let me know!
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
I apologize for any confusion in my previous message. Let’s clarify what happens when we move a line down by 5 units and the operations that follow.
1. **Line B** remains unchanged as:
\[
y = mx \quad \text{(crosses at (0,0))}
\]
2. **Line C** initially described as crossing at (0, -5):
\[
y = mx - 5
\]
### Moved Down 5 Units
If we move **Line C** down by 5 units, the new equation of Line C becomes:
\[
y = mx - 10 \quad \text{(crosses at (0, -10))}
\]
### Decreased by Factor of 5
If we then decrease this new Line C by a factor of 5, we scale the entire equation:
\[
y = \frac{1}{5}(mx - 10)
\]
Which simplifies to:
\[
y = \frac{m}{5}x - 2
\]
### Summary
Thus, after moving Line C down by 5 units and then decreasing it by a factor of 5, the final equation of Line C would be:
\[
y = \frac{m}{5}x - 2
\]
If the option you're considering is only moving the line down by 5 units, then the new equation of Line C would simply be:
\[
y = mx - 10
\]
I hope this effectively addresses your question! If you have specific options you’d like me to evaluate, please provide them.
1. **Line B** remains unchanged as:
\[
y = mx \quad \text{(crosses at (0,0))}
\]
2. **Line C** initially described as crossing at (0, -5):
\[
y = mx - 5
\]
### Moved Down 5 Units
If we move **Line C** down by 5 units, the new equation of Line C becomes:
\[
y = mx - 10 \quad \text{(crosses at (0, -10))}
\]
### Decreased by Factor of 5
If we then decrease this new Line C by a factor of 5, we scale the entire equation:
\[
y = \frac{1}{5}(mx - 10)
\]
Which simplifies to:
\[
y = \frac{m}{5}x - 2
\]
### Summary
Thus, after moving Line C down by 5 units and then decreasing it by a factor of 5, the final equation of Line C would be:
\[
y = \frac{m}{5}x - 2
\]
If the option you're considering is only moving the line down by 5 units, then the new equation of Line C would simply be:
\[
y = mx - 10
\]
I hope this effectively addresses your question! If you have specific options you’d like me to evaluate, please provide them.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.