To determine whether Liam or Armonte is correct, it is necessary to consider the given information and analyze it in terms of causation and correlation. Without the specific details of the information provided, it is challenging to draw a concrete conclusion. However, here are two reasons supporting each claim:
1. Liam is correct:
- If Liam argues that the given information represents correlation rather than causation, he might be considering the lack of a clear cause-and-effect relationship between the variables mentioned. Correlation merely implies a statistical relationship between two or more variables without determining one variable's influence over the other.
- Liam might also be considering the possibility of confounding variables. Without controlling for other factors that could impact the outcome, it becomes challenging to make a definitive causal claim.
2. Armonte is correct:
- If Armonte argues that the given information represents causation rather than correlation, he might be emphasizing a compelling theoretical or scientific background explaining the connection between the variables mentioned. If the information is supported by established theories or prior research, it could point towards causation.
- Armonte might have additional information that strengthens the causal interpretation, such as data from a controlled experiment or a longitudinal study demonstrating the cause-and-effect relationship between the variables.
Ultimately, without the details of the given information, it is impossible to establish with certainty who is correct. The specific context and evidence supporting the claim of either Liam or Armonte are critical in determining the accuracy of their interpretations.
Liam’s friend Armonte said he believes this represents causation instead of a correlation. Is Liam or Armonte correct? Give at least two reasons to help support your claim.
5 answers
A man walks 10 miles in x hours. How far does he walk in one hour? Which expression represents this?
To determine how far the man walks in one hour, we divide the total distance walked (10 miles) by the total number of hours taken (x hours). This can be represented by the expression 10 miles divided by x hours, which would be written as:
10 miles / x hours
This expression represents the distance the man walks in one hour.
10 miles / x hours
This expression represents the distance the man walks in one hour.
Question 9 of 10
Which of the equations below could be the equation of this parabola?
+1+1
-5
A. x=y²
B. y=x²
5
(0, 0)
Vertex
|||||
5
Which of the equations below could be the equation of this parabola?
+1+1
-5
A. x=y²
B. y=x²
5
(0, 0)
Vertex
|||||
5
To determine which equation could represent the given parabola, we need to analyze the provided information. The vertex of the parabola is given as (0, 0), which means that the vertex is at the origin (0, 0).
Looking at the given options, we can identify that option B, y = x², would represent this parabola.
When we graph the equation y = x², the vertex is located at (0, 0), and it opens upwards, which matches the given information. The other option, x = y², does not meet the criteria as it represents a parabola that opens sideways.
Therefore, the equation that could represent the given parabola is y = x² (option B).
Looking at the given options, we can identify that option B, y = x², would represent this parabola.
When we graph the equation y = x², the vertex is located at (0, 0), and it opens upwards, which matches the given information. The other option, x = y², does not meet the criteria as it represents a parabola that opens sideways.
Therefore, the equation that could represent the given parabola is y = x² (option B).