To represent the situation with Kim and Pam, we need to consider how many puzzles Kim can solve and how many targets Pam can hit in 2 minutes (120 seconds).
-
Kim's Puzzle Solving:
- It takes Kim 6 seconds to solve each puzzle.
- In 120 seconds, the number of puzzles Kim can solve is: \[ \frac{120 \text{ seconds}}{6 \text{ seconds per puzzle}} = 20 \text{ puzzles} \]
-
Pam's Target Hitting:
- It takes Pam 3 seconds to hit each target.
- In 120 seconds, the number of targets Pam can hit is: \[ \frac{120 \text{ seconds}}{3 \text{ seconds per target}} = 40 \text{ targets} \]
-
Graph Representation:
- On the x-axis, we can represent the number of puzzles solved by Kim (0 to 20).
- On the y-axis, we can represent the number of targets hit by Pam (0 to 40).
- If we create a scenario where one partner is maximizing their time while the other is doing the same, we can expect a linear relationship where:
- If Kim spends all her time solving puzzles, she reaches the maximum of 20 puzzles and 0 targets.
- Conversely, if Pam spends all her time hitting targets, she reaches the maximum of 0 puzzles and 40 targets.
The resulting graph represents a line running from (20, 0) to (0, 40).
The graph must demonstrate that as one partner does more of their task (Kim solving more puzzles), the other partner does less of theirs (Pam hitting fewer targets), illustrating a trade-off in the competition where one’s gain is the other’s loss.
Thus, the graph representing this situation would be a straight line between the points (20, 0) and (0, 40).