Ask a New Question
Menu

Key Concepts:

What are two types of evidence writers should use to support their claims?

What are claims that make the opposite point the writer is trying to make?

What is a rebuttal?

Practice:
Using this article from the American Psychiatric Association,
What evidence from the article would support the claim that there is something special about the bond between humans and animals?
Answer:

In your own words, what would be a fair counterclaim to the claim that pets are part of the family?
Answer:

What evidence from the article would refute (prove wrong) the counterclaim that people do not consider pets as a part of the family?
Answer:

1 answer

Key Concepts:

  1. Two Types of Evidence Writers Should Use to Support Their Claims:

    • Empirical Evidence: This includes data, statistics, research studies, or other quantifiable information that supports a claim.
    • Anecdotal Evidence: This includes personal stories or testimonials that illustrate a point and provide real-world examples of the claim being made.

  2. Claims That Make the Opposite Point the Writer Is Trying to Make:

    • These are known as counterclaims. They present an opposing viewpoint or argument that challenges the writer’s main argument or claim.

  3. What Is a Rebuttal?

    • A rebuttal is a response to a counterclaim. It offers evidence or reasoning that argues against the counterclaim, reinforcing the original claim and showing why it is valid despite the opposing viewpoint.

Practice:

Evidence from the Article to Support the Claim that There Is Something Special About the Bond Between Humans and Animals: Answer: Evidence from the article may illustrate how interactions with pets can lead to improved mental health outcomes, such as reduced stress and anxiety, or mention studies that show the physiological benefits of having pets, such as lowered blood pressure and increased levels of oxytocin, the "bonding hormone."

A Fair Counterclaim to the Claim that Pets Are Part of the Family: Answer: A fair counterclaim might argue that not all individuals view pets as part of the family; some see them merely as animals with no familial status, emphasizing that family relationships are based on human connections and responsibilities.

Evidence from the Article That Would Refute the Counterclaim that People Do Not Consider Pets as Part of the Family: Answer: Evidence that could refute this counterclaim might include survey data showing that a significant percentage of pet owners view their pets as family members, or research indicating that people often prioritize their pets' well-being and include them in family activities and celebrations, demonstrating a familial bond.