To determine which equation Kelia is solving by multiplying both sides by 4, we can analyze each option:
-
4 + 6x = 1
- If she multiplies both sides by 4:
\( 4(4 + 6x) = 4(1) \)
This leads to:
\( 16 + 24x = 4 \) - This is not a step that reflects a clear intention to simplify or isolate \( x \).
- If she multiplies both sides by 4:
-
6 + 4x = 1
- If she multiplies both sides by 4:
\( 4(6 + 4x) = 4(1) \)
Leads to:
\( 24 + 16x = 4 \) - This also does not seem to represent a clear step towards isolating \( x \).
- If she multiplies both sides by 4:
-
4 + x/6 = 1
- If she multiplies both sides by 4:
\( 4(4 + x/6) = 4(1) \)
Leads to:
\( 16 + \frac{4x}{6} = 4 \)
This is equivalent to:
\( 16 + \frac{2x}{3} = 4 \) - This does not simplify nicely and looks convoluted with the fraction.
- If she multiplies both sides by 4:
-
6 + x/4 = 1
- If she multiplies both sides by 4:
\( 4(6 + x/4) = 4(1) \)
Leads to:
\( 24 + x = 4 \)
This clearly isolates \( x \) in the subsequent steps, making it a viable option.
- If she multiplies both sides by 4:
Given these analyses, the most likely equation that Kelia is solving, where her second step is to multiply both sides by 4, would be:
6 + x/4 = 1.