Judicial activism involves judges interpreting the law broadly and sometimes making decisions that expand judicial power.

Question

t or f

Answer 1

True. Judicial activism refers to the practice of judges interpreting laws and the Constitution in a way that can lead to broad or progressive outcomes, often involving the courts stepping into areas of political or social life that might traditionally be left to legislatures or other branches of government. This approach can result in decisions that expand judicial power and influence over public policy.