Let's analyze Jerome's work step by step.
Jerome calculated \(589 \times 12\) and wrote:
- \(589 \times 12 = 1178 + 589 = 1767\)
The correct steps for calculating \(589 \times 12\) would be:
-
Multiply \(589\) by \(2\) (the units digit of 12): \[ 589 \times 2 = 1178 \]
-
Multiply \(589\) by \(10\) (the tens digit of 12): \[ 589 \times 10 = 5890 \]
-
Then add the two products together: \[ 1178 + 5890 \]
Now let's check Jerome's specific claims or potential mistakes.
A. Jerome forgot to carry the 1 when he multiplied \(2 \times 9\):
- This does not apply, as he correctly calculated \(589 \times 2 = 1178\).
B. Jerome added incorrectly:
- In fact, \(1178 + 589\) was done, but the latter multiplication should have been with \(10\) instead of adding to \(589\).
C. Jerome forgot to use \(0\) as a placeholder:
- This is indeed true; when multiplying by \(10\), there should have been a placeholder \(0\).
D. Jerome solved the problem correctly:
- He did not; the result \(1767\) is incorrect for \(589 \times 12\).
Based on this analysis, the true statement about Jerome's work is:
C. Jerome forgot to use 0 as a placeholder.