To determine which graph properly represents the relationship between the amount of salami (in pounds) bought by Jayson (112 pounds) and the cost (in dollars) of the salami he purchased ($3.75), we need to evaluate the points provided.
The key information is that Jayson bought 112 pounds for $3.75.
In terms of graphical representation:
- The x-axis represents the pounds of salami (amount).
- The y-axis represents the dollars spent (cost).
Given that the quantities mentioned (112 pounds and $3.75) are not within the ranges of the axes presented in the options (0 to 4 for both axes), it appears the graphs may not be a direct match for the information provided. However, we can analyze the plotted points in relation to the overall framework:
-
First graph: has a point at (2, 3.75), which represents buying 2 pounds for $3.75 — this is not correct since Jayson bought 112 pounds.
-
Second graph: has a point at (1.5, 3), which is not relevant as it does not match the amount or cost.
-
Third graph: displays a point at (3.75, 1.5), which also does not correspond with what Jayson bought.
-
Fourth graph: has a point at (1.5, 3.75), which indicates buying 1.5 pounds for $3.75, which is also not correct.
None of the provided graphs matches the relationship of Jayson buying 112 pounds of salami for $3.75.
If you were to graph the relationship correctly, there should be a point indicating that for 112 pounds, Jayson would be spending $3.75, which is outside the provided ranges.
For correct identification, we would typically look for a direct correlation if they were based on a larger scale, but with the data given, there's no correct response within the options provided.