No, Jan is not correct.
A rhombus is a type of parallelogram, but not all parallelograms are rhombuses. A rhombus is defined as a quadrilateral with all sides of equal length. A parallelogram is simply a quadrilateral with opposite sides that are parallel. So while a rhombus can be considered a parallelogram, a parallelogram does not necessarily have all its sides equal in length, making it not a rhombus.
Jan says that a rhombus is a parallelogram and that every parallelogram is also a rhombus. Is Jan correct? Question 2 Part B Explain why or why not. (4 points) BoldItalicUnderlineBullet listNumbered list
1 answer