Jamal made a list of ideas for enhancing his presentation about whales. Evaluate his ideas and identify which ones he should remove. Select the two correct answers.(1 point)

Question

Responses

the saying, “It is better to be a big fish in a small pond than a small fish in a mighty ocean”
the saying, “It is better to be a big fish in a small pond than a small fish in a mighty ocean”

two photographs comparing a toothed whale’s mouth and a baleen whale’s mouth
two photographs comparing a toothed whale’s mouth and a baleen whale’s mouth

an illustration comparing the size of a person, an African elephant, and a blue whale
an illustration comparing the size of a person, an African elephant, and a blue whale

a video of a coastal storm with waves crashing on a rocky shoreline below a lighthouse
a video of a coastal storm with waves crashing on a rocky shoreline below a lighthouse

the World Wildlife Fund’s map of whale migration routes, color coded by type of whale

Answer 1

To evaluate Jamal's ideas for enhancing his presentation about whales, we can identify which ideas do not directly relate to the topic of whales or enhance understanding of them.

The two ideas Jamal should consider removing are:

1. The saying, “It is better to be a big fish in a small pond than a small fish in a mighty ocean” - This saying is metaphorical and not directly related to the subject of whales, which may confuse the audience rather than enhance their understanding of the topic.

2. A video of a coastal storm with waves crashing on a rocky shoreline below a lighthouse - While this might provide an interesting visual, it does not directly relate to whales, their biology, or their behavior, making it less relevant to the presentation's focus.

The other options (photographs comparing whale mouths, an illustration comparing sizes, and the map of migration routes) are directly related to the subject of whales and would enhance the presentation effectively.