Let's evaluate Izzie's steps to determine the truth of each statement.
-
Step 1: 3(t + 1) - 4t >_ -5
- This simplifies to \( 3t + 3 - 4t > -5 \) which is correct.
-
Step 2: -t + 3 > -5
- This is correct as well; the equation simplifies correctly to this form.
-
Step 3: -t > -2
- This step is achieved by subtracting 3 from both sides: \( -t + 3 - 3 > -5 - 3 \), which simplifies to \( -t > -2 \). This is correct.
-
Step 4: t ≤ 2
- To isolate \( t \), when you multiply or divide by a negative number, you reverse the inequality sign. Thus, from \( -t > -2 \), when dividing by -1, the inequality should flip to \( t < 2 \). This is correct.
Now we can evaluate each of the statements:
-
Izzie should not have changed the inequality symbol from >_ to <_: False. She correctly changed the inequality symbol when dividing by -1.
-
Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3: False. There is no mistake in this transition.
-
Izzie made a mistake going from step 3 to step 4: False. She correctly flipped the inequality when dividing by -1.
-
The correct answer should have been t <_ 8: False. The correct solution based on the work done is \( t < 2 \).
-
Izzie made no mistakes in solving this inequality: True. She solved the inequality correctly.
Summary of the Truth Values:
- Statement 1: False
- Statement 2: False
- Statement 3: False
- Statement 4: False
- Statement 5: True