Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.
Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective.
(2 points)
Responses
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
1 answer
The fact on which the two sources disagree is:
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Source 1 emphasizes the positive impact of recycling on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and protecting the environment, while Source 2 discusses the challenges and potential ineffectiveness of recycling programs in schools, without outright stating that they damage the environment. Thus, this statement represents a disagreement between the two sources.
9 answers
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer