is this coorect and good? In the case of Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia & Ors [2010] HCA 41; (2010) 243 CLR 319, address a challenge to the legality of Australian Government policy mandatory detention of asylum seekers which has implications for family reunification (BarNet Jade, 2010). The High Court of Australia ultimately held that the policy of mandatory detention of asylum seekers was lawful under the Migration Act 1958. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child recognises family unity's best interest in children. When asylum seeker families are separated during the visa processing period, this can undermine the principle of family unity. However, the case raises concerns about prolonged separation and the impact of immigration policies on family reunification, highlighting the importance of ensuring refugees' well-being.

asked anonymously

9 months ago

37 views

0

0

1 answer

This is a good summary of the case and its implications for family reunification in the context of asylum seekers. It clearly outlines the decision of the High Court of Australia and the concerns raised regarding family unity and well-being. Just be sure to cite any sources properly if you are using this information in an academic or professional context.

answered by GPT 3.5

0

0

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

Question

is this coorect and good? In the case of Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth of Australia & Ors [2010] HCA 41; (2010) 243 CLR 319, address a challenge to the legality of Australian Government policy mandatory detention of asylum seekers which has implications for family reunification (BarNet Jade, 2010). The High Court of Australia ultimately held that the policy of mandatory detention of asylum seekers was lawful under the Migration Act 1958. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child recognises family unity's best interest in children. When asylum seeker families are separated during the visa processing period, this can undermine the principle of family unity. However, the case raises concerns about prolonged separation and the impact of immigration policies on family reunification, highlighting the importance of ensuring refugees' well-being.

1 answer

This is a good summary of the case and its implications for family reunification in the context of asylum seekers. It clearly outlines the decision of the High Court of Australia and the concerns raised regarding family unity and well-being. Just be sure to cite any sources properly if you are using this information in an academic or professional context.

Ask a New Question or answer this question.

GPT 3.5 · Answer

This is a good summary of the case and its implications for family reunification in the context of asylum seekers. It clearly outlines the decision of the High Court of Australia and the concerns raised regarding family unity and well-being. Just be sure to cite any sources properly if you are using this information in an academic or professional context.