Is the history function of CodeHS more similar to a full backup or an incremental backup? Explain your answer.

1 answer

The history function in CodeHS is more similar to a full backup rather than an incremental backup.

Explanation:

  1. Full Backup:

    • A full backup captures the entire state of a system or dataset at a specific point in time. This means all files, folders, and settings are backed up completely, providing a comprehensive snapshot that can be restored if needed.
    • In the context of CodeHS, the history function keeps track of all the versions of a program or project across time, allowing users to view or revert to any previous version. This reflects a full state of the code at various points in its development.
  2. Incremental Backup:

    • An incremental backup, on the other hand, only saves the changes made since the last backup was taken. This means if you perform incremental backups frequently, you need the last full backup along with all subsequent incremental backups to restore everything completely.
    • CodeHS's history function does not operate in this manner. It maintains a comprehensive log of all versions rather than just changes from a previous version. Each recorded version can be seen independently, and users can access the complete code as it existed at that point.

Overall, since the CodeHS history function provides access to complete snapshots of the project at different stages, it's akin to a full backup system.