is "that her daughter baked for her" a dependent clause?

1 answer

No, "that her daughter baked for her" is a noun clause acting as the direct object of the verb "is." It is not a dependent clause because it does not contain a subject and verb relationship and cannot stand alone as a complete sentence.
Similar Questions
  1. Jessica ate the cookies that her daughter baked for her.In one to two sentences, identify the words "that her daughter baked for
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Jessica ate the cookies that her daughter baked for her.In one to two sentences, identify the bold words as an independent
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. That her daughter baked for her is in boldJessica ate the cookies that her daughter baked for her. In one or two sentences,
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. That her daughter baked for her is in boldJessica ate the cookies that her daughter baked for her. In one sentences, identify
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions